FRAC Operations Treatability Report Wastewater Treatment Case Study

Impressive Oil Water Separation

Scenario

The water sample from a CUDD Energy oil field site was treated for solids reduction, BOD reduction, metals and dissolved metals.

Metal Machining Wastewater Case Study

The table below shows the results of the analytical, with the untreated water sample and sample treated with Floccin TR-1™. The jar tests below show the effect of the Floccin TR-1™.

Analytical Results

Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 9,300 ppm 160 ppm 98%
Turbidity 180 13 93%
pH 6.77 7.48
Electrical Conductivity 11400 11900 4%
Total Dissolved Solids 9,100 9,000 1%
Metals
Antimony ND ND
Arsenic ND ND
Barium 960 280 71%
Berylium ND ND
Cadmium ND ND
Chromium 13 ND 100%
Cobalt ND ND
Copper ND ND
Iron 8,200 370 95%
Lead ND ND
Manganese 150 130 13%
Mercury 0.26 ND 100%
Molybdenum 48 30 38%
Nickel 16 9.2 43%
Selenium 120 ND 100%
Silver ND ND
Thallium ND ND
Vanadium ND ND
Zinc 32 21 34%
Cations
Calcium 110 120 -9%
Magnesium 11 15 -36%
Potassium 35 37 -6%
Sodium 2,600 2,700 -4%
Anions
Alkalinity (bicarbonate) 750 730 3%
Alkalinity (carbonate) ND ND
Alkalinity (hydroxide) N/A N/A
Boron N/A N/A
Bromide N/A N/A
Chloride 3,500 3,700 -6%
Fluoride N/A N/A
Nitrate ND ND
Sulfate 270 220 19%
Phosphate N/A N/A
Phosphorus N/A N/A

Conclusion

The treatability shows the high removal rate for heavy metals, minimal increase in EC/TDS as shown in the anions/cations and high removal of particulate solids in the form of suspended solids. Increases are shown as negative percent reductions and are the contribution of the Floccin. The minimal increase is less than conventional chemistry. There was not enough sample to test for Total Petroleum hydrocarbons, COD, BOD or any bacterial colony counts.

Click to Download pdf of this FRAC Operations Treatability Report…

Download more industrial wastewater treatment case studies here…

Get Your Own Evaluation…Get Started

Call 1-877-965-1577
Toll Free

Wastewater Treatment Success Stories Home

Oily Wastewater Processing Facility Wastewater Treatment Case Study

Impressive Oil Water Separation

This is the result of our Floccin 1105™ product treating a sample from an oily wastewater treatment facility.  As you can see, the Floccin 1105™ was very effective at clarifying the waste as well as capturing all of the oil. These results were achieved with no pH adjustment and minimal Floccin™ addition (~ 1g/1000ml).

The client is going to purchase and install a CFU-20 to treat their 6,000 gallons/day and will either reuse the water for washing parts and equipment or discharge to the local POTW.

Oily Wastewater Processing Case Study

 

Click to Download pdf of this Oily Wastewater Processing Facility Study…

Download more industrial wastewater treatment case studies here…

Get Your Own Evaluation…Get Started

Call 1-877-965-1577
Toll Free

Wastewater Treatment Success Stories Home

Metal Machining Facility Wastewater Treatment Case Study

Metal Machining Facility Wastewater Treatment Case Study Effective Breaking of the Oil Emulsion in Machine Shop Wastewater

This is the result of our Floccin 1105™ product treating a sample from a Metal machining facility.

The sample was at a pH of 9 and CO2 was added to bring the pH down to neutral (pH at 7).

The Floccin 1105™ was very effective at clarifying the waste, breaking the strong oil emulsion and capturing the oil. The dosage was minimal with the Floccin™ addition (~ 1g/1000ml).

Metal Machining Wastewater Case Study

 

Click to Download pdf of this Metal Machining Facility Wastewater Case Study…

Download more industrial wastewater treatment case studies here…

Get Your Own Evaluation…Get Started

Call 1-877-965-1577
Toll Free

Wastewater Treatment Success Stories Home

Tuna Processing & Protein Recovery Wastewater Case Study

Tuna Processing & Protein Recovery Wastewater Case Study – 99% Reduction in TSS – 91% BOD – 7.5% Protein Recovery

The water from a tuna processing facility was treated for solids reduction, BOD reduction and recovery of the protein from the high protein rendering sludge for reuse as animal feed.

The protein is very valuable for use in the animal food industry.

Currently the facility has no process for recovery of the protein and 100% of the high protein rendering sludge is disposed of at the local landfill, costing the company about $200,000 a year in sludge disposable fees without any ROI.

Tortilla Manufacturer Wastewater Case Study

Integrated Engineers, Inc. performed treatability on the water as shown below.  The dosage was quantified to be 4.17lbs of Floccin™ 1105 per 1,000 gallons treated.  The water was then run through analyticals testing which the results are shown below.

Constituent Untreated Treated % Reduction
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 7,200 ppm 55 ppm 99%
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 13,000 ppm 1,100 ppm 91%
Protein Recovery 0 ppm 12,000 ppm 7.5%

Click to Download pdf of this Tuna Processing Wastewater Study…

Download more industrial wastewater treatment case studies here…

Get Your Own Evaluation…Get Started

Call 1-877-965-1577
Toll Free

Wastewater Treatment Success Stories Home

Latex Manufacturer Wastewater Case Study

Targeting TSS and Achieving Clarity Latex Manufacturer Wastewater Case Study

The wastewater sample when received was a pH of 10.3.

The request for a wastewater solution was to remove TSS and obtain better water clarity. Various Floccin™ blends were used until the water clarity was acceptable.

Better results were obtained combining the two types of wastewater and performing the jar test.

The recommended treatment is to use Floccin™ 1119 first at 4 lbs. per 1,000 gallons and add a small amount of base to lower the pH to 7.5.

The jar test results are shown below and indicate the untreated solids on the right and the treated with the 1119 separated very well on the left. You can see the difference in the bottom of the treated jar.

The Floccin™ 1119 is shipped in 50 lb. bags and is priced very reasonably at in 2,000 pallet quantities. Trial sizes of the Floccin™ 1119 are available.

Call for pricing.

Tortilla Manufacturer Wastewater Case Study

 

Click to Download pdf of this Latex Manufacturer Wastewater Study…

Download more industrial wastewater treatment case studies here…

Get Your Own Evaluation…Get Started

Call 1-877-965-1577
Toll Free

Wastewater Treatment Success Stories Home

Value Points for Saving Money with Floccin™ – Volume 1 Issue 11

Value Added with Floccin™

By David Wensloff, PE

1. Cost by the Pound

The Floccin™ will always be competitively priced versus alum or Ferric (less than $0.30/lb) and polymer ($2.00/lb).

Although Floccin™ may seem costly, when you consider the trap some chemicals vendors will try to put you in by only comparing the Floccin™ cost per pound with their conventional chemistry, there are several value points that prove Floccin™ is a more economical choice by far.

The Floccin™ reduces Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Total Suspended Solids, Fats, Oils and Greases to lower levels, thereby reducing the surcharges paid to the POTW

 

2. Reduced Surcharges

The Floccin™ removes BOD, TSS and FOG (Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Total Suspended Solids, Fats/Oils/Greases) to lower levels, thereby reducing the surcharges paid to the POTW.

This is usually sufficient to justify the higher chemical costs of the Floccin, but consider all of the value added savings outlined herein.

3. Reduced Quantities of Chemicals Used

Usually the Floccin™ alone is all that is needed versus 3-4 different products (acid/caustic/coagulant/polymer/Diatomaceous earth).

The Floccin™ generates less sludge and dewaters to a drier dewatered cake

 

4. No Diatomaceous Earth

Most of the time DE (Diatomaceous Earth) is not needed as a Filter press pre-coat when they use the Floccin™ Products. Usually a Filter press will require 1-2 (50) lb. bags of DE as a pre-coat to decrease the sticking of the sludge to the plates.

Note, for every pound of DE used, it generates 3 pounds of sludge.

DE costs about $18 per bag and accounts for the cost of DE sludge disposal as about 10 – 20% by volume in DE which is eliminated if they use the Floccin™.

Some facilities have filter cloths that are tighter weave and need the DE even with the Floccin™. They will still be able to reduce the DE by 50%, so there is still a quantifiable savings here.

What are their sludge disposal costs and what part is from the DE as this can be reduced?

5. No Drum Disposal

Every drum has a $45 deposit that is not returned to the customer and is used as the fee for drum disposal (either disposed by recycling or washed and reused by the chemical supplier). Account for this!

Example: A client uses 5-6 drums each month of chemical which equals 6 times $45, which is $270 each month in drum disposal.

Water re-use is done efficiently with the Floccin™

 

6. No Drum and Tote Storage Cost

Full and empty drums must be stored in a secondary contained area. This means that these chemicals must be stored inside a bermed storage area in case of leakage or spills as they are hazardous.

Empty drums and totes need to be stored until they are picked up by the chemical supply company. Does the facility have storage issues or limitations? What does secondary storage and handling cost them?

The Floccin™ sludge will pass the STLC/TCLP EPA tests thereby not releasing toxins in a landfill

 

7. Hazard Chemicals to Non-Hazardous

The Floccin™ is nonhazardous, alum, ferric, acid (pH lower than 5.0), and caustic (pH over 10) are all hazardous to the employees.

Your facility must pay extra for workman’s Compensation and accident and injury insurances for having hazardous chemical handling onsite. What is this costing you?

8. Reduced Sludge Production

The Floccin™ generates less sludge and dewaters to a drier dewatered cake. This means there is less sludge disposal cost. So the facility generates less tons/month. Sludge cost is based on weight and volume.

If the sludge is drier, you are paying less for disposing of water that is in the sludge and more for % solids in the sludge. The cost for sludge disposal is in the tipping fee (cost of dumping) and freight costs. Typical tipping fee for a 20 yard roll off box is $900.

The Floccin™ makes a larger floc that settles faster or floats quicker than conventional chemistry

 

9. Sludge Reclassification

The Floccin™ sludge will pass the STLC/TCLP EPA tests thereby not releasing toxins in a landfill.

The facility can reclassify their sludge disposal from hazardous to nonhazardous but regulated. This must be verified with analytical tests and fully documented at each facility.

Result: Reduced cost and elimination of long term environmental liability for landfill leachate and future environmental cleanup as every disposer of sludges into landfills are documented in their manifests (paperwork designating the facility as the hazardous sludge generator).

What does this save you? Typically the savings will be around $3,000-$5,000 per 20 yard roll-off box.

The Floccin™ can reduce the metals to below levels that conventional chemistry can’t achieve

 

10. Water Re-Use

Many times, a facility can reuse their wastewater. Why, because the Floccin™ does not contribute to the Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and Conductivity as compared to conventional chemistry. Some facilities can become zero discharge, what does this mean? They eliminate any wastewater sewer charges, sampling and environmental compliance with the local POTW.

11. Recover Oil

The Floccin™ has a high affinity for removing oil (FOG, TOG, TPH) from wastewater. Once removed, it is absorbed into the Floc sludge. The oil can be recovered if it is heated to 150 degrees and dewatered in a 3 phase centrifuge (water, oil, solids). Recovered oil can be sold as it has value for refiners, biodiesel and other commodity applications.

Usually the Floccin™ alone is all that is needed versus 3 to 4 different products

 

12. Electrical Savings

If the system can increase hydraulic or biological capacity, what is the savings in electricity? For example, if a plant can run the same daily water in 25% less operating hours, what power savings is recognized? What would be the electrical cost for the kilowatts for each hour of use?

13. Labor Savings

The Floccin™ saves labor. How? Less chemicals and feed equipment to maintain, no drum handling, no pre-coat of the Filter Press (the DE pre-coat procedure is to pour 1-2 bags into a hopper, add and mix water, run Filter press pump for 45 minutes to pre-coat the press) then switch to load the Filter Press. The Floccin™ releases easily from a Filter Press therefore, reduction in filter press plate pressure washing which takes about 4 hours/wash.

The Floccin™ releases easily from a Filter Press therefore, reduction in filter press plate pressure washing

 

14. Shear Strength

The Floccin™ sludge has a higher shear strength that allows sludge pumping and dewatering without the addition of polymers to rebuild the floc. The Filtrate from dewatering has lower suspended solids (solids carry thru) thereby reducing the load to the wastewater system by having to retreat these solids for removal before discharge. This means that the filtrate from a Filter Press, Belt Press or Centrifuge can be discharged directly or if the system is designed to return the filtrate to retreat, it will require less chemistry to separate in their process. What is this value?

Recovered oil can be sold as it has value for refiners, biodiesel and other commodity applications

 

15. Increase System Capacity

The Floccin™ makes a larger floc that settles faster or floats quicker than conventional chemistry.

Many facilities limit their production as they cannot exceed their environmental discharge limits without paying significant surcharges or fines. Is the wastewater system limiting the facilities’ capacity to increase production?

Using the Floccin™ increases the system hydraulic capacity at no capital cost. What is this worth? Look at labor and electrical savings.

The Floccin™ does not contribute to the Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and Conductivity as compared to conventional chemistry

 

16. Recover Precious Metals

The Floccin™ removes metals from wastewater, all metals. If the industry has precious metals (Gold, platinum, silver, etc.) these can be removed and the sludge generated that holds these metals, smeltered and full recovery of these metals. What can this save the customer?

17. Metals Removal

The Floccin™ can reduce the metals to below levels that conventional chemistry can’t achieve. What is this worth? It allows the plant to run their system at a higher flow and increase facility production with no capital costs. Follow the Metals Removal Jar testing Procedure.

The Floccin™ is nonhazardous, alum, ferric, acid (pH lower than 5.0), and caustic (pH over 10) are all hazardous to the employees

 

[top]

Example: Food Processing Plant

Current Wastewater Conditions:

  • A food processing facility has a DAF with a daily flow of 200,000 gallons per day or 208 gallons per minute for 16 hours.
  • They use (8) 275 gallon totes of alum, 4 drums of caustic, 3 totes of polymer and generate (8) 20 yard roll off boxes of dewatered sludge.
  • They use 8 pallets of (50) 40 lb. bags of DE per month.
  • The operators work 3 shifts and spend all day mixing polymer, changing drums, running the filter press, blowing down settled solids, etc.
  • Surcharges are $0.30/lb. for BOD and TSS.
  • The effluent has a BOD of 2,500 ppm and a TSS of 700 ppm.
  • The sludge is dewatered with a plate and frame press and conveyed to the roll off boxes.
  • Tipping Fees at the landfill for the sludge are $900 per 20 yard roll off box plus $400 in freight.
  • The system requires a total of 100 hp to run and the utility rate is $0.16/kw‐hr.

Current Wastewater Considerations:

After a thorough site evaluation and jar tests and before running the trial, a sales person using the above listed value added steps makes an educated estimation of the current costs:

Consider:

  • Reduced Surcharges
  • Reduced Sludge Volume
  • Reduced Number of Chemicals
  • Reduced Hazardous Chemicals
  • Less Chemicals = Less Labor
  • Increased System Hydraulic Capacity
  • Reduced Electricity Usage
  • Improved Dewatering
  • Increased Sludge Dryness
  • Reduced Drum Disposal Costs.

Since this is a food plant,

Do Not Consider:

  • Water Reuse
  • Metals Removal
  • Sludge Reclassification
  • Oil Recovery

These aforementioned should be considered if your facility is considering any of them.

[top]

Floccin™ Trial Results:

Using the Floccin™ 1105, the usage rate was determined to be 500 lbs/day.

During the trail, it was tested and confirmed that the DAF could run at 275 gpm due to good floc formation and the resulting effluent BOD was 900 ppm and the TSS was 60 ppm.

It was observed that the sludge generated was reduced to an estimated 5 – 20 yard roll off boxes per month and it was drier and no DE was used.

Since the operator did not have to attend to the DE pre-coat, chemical tote/drum changes, they were able to unload and load trucks with the forklift as well as other tasks.

Food Plant Cost Scenario

With Conventional Chemistry:

Factors Cost Description
Chemical Cost
$32,820 per month
  1. 8 totes of alum at $0.32/lb. at 2,400 lbs each = $6,144 per month
  2. Freight for alum at 4 totes each delivery at $0.10/lb. = $960 per load = $1,920 per month
  3. 4 drums of caustic at 0.48/lb. x 700 lbs each = $1,344 per month
  4. Freight for 4 drums caustic each delivery @ $0.10/lb. = $280 per month
  5. 3 totes polymer at $2.00/lb. at 2,275 lbs each = $13,650
  6. Freight for 3 totes of polymer at $0.10/lb. = $682 per month
  7. D.E. at 8 x 50 bags at $18/bag = $7,200
  8. Freight for 8 pallets of DE = $1,600
Surcharges
$40,038 per month
Typical BOD that is 2,500 ppm at $0.30/lb. = $1,251 per day = $37,350 per month
Typical TSS that is 700 ppm at $0.30/lb. = $350 per day = $10,508 per month
Less Chemical Used Site Dependent, but could be an extra cost for unused chemicals sitting in storage
DE Used
$1625 per month
16,000 lbs of DE makes 48,000 lbs of sludge = 1 1/4 20 yard dumpsters per month
Disposal cost = 1.25 roll off x ($900 tip + 400 frt) = $1,625 per month
Drum & Tote Disposal or Return
$1,005 per month
8 totes alum at $75/tote = $600 per month
4 drums of caustic at $45 per drum = $180 per month
3 totes of polymer at $75 per tote = $225 per month
Hazardous Chemicals
$3,600 per month
Alum, caustic, polymer are hazardous = Est. value at $5 per man hour x 24 hours x 30 days per month = $3,600 per month.
Sludge Production $10,400 per month (8) 20 yard roll offs at $900 tipping fee = $7,200 per month
(8) 20 yard roll offs at $400 freight each = $3,200 per month
Labor Costs
$3,600 per month
3 operators with 4 man hours less labor each per day at $25 per hr = 100 per day: $3,600 per month.
Increases System Capacity Test this during the trial, see if it is a limitation currently with production
Electricity
$5,700 per month
100 hp = 74.6 kW at 16 hours at $0.16 per kw-hr = 190 per day = $5,700 per month
Shear Strength
$3,600 per month
In facilities other than food processing they may need to use polymer as a floc additive prior to dewatering for a drier cake.
Recover Oil The facility has low oil as they cook very little, so probably not. If it is a cooking plant, check.

Overall Costs

$102,388 per month

 

Food Plant Cost Scenario:

With Floccin™ Chemistry

Floccin™ Factors Floccin™ Cost Description
Chemical Cost
$52,500 per month
  1. 1,000 lbs. of Floccin™ 1105 per day at $1.65/lb. = $1650 per day = $49,500
  2. Freight for 30,000 lbs Floccin™ = $3,000 per month
Surcharges
$11,408 per month
BOD is now 900 ppm at $0.30/lb. = $350 per day = $10,508 per month
TSS is now 60 ppm at $0.30/lb. = $30 per day = $900 per month
Less Chemical Used Site Dependent, but a value that can be replaced
No DE Used $0 per month 16,000 lbs of DE makes 48,000 lbs of sludge = 1-1/4 20 yard dumpsters per month
Drum & Tote Disposal or Return
$0 per month
Zero
Hazardous Chemicals Savings
$3,600 per month
Zero, Saves $3,600
Sludge Production
$6,500 per month
(5) 20 yard roll offs at $900 tipping fee = $4,500 per month
(5) 20 yard roll offs at $400 freight each = $2,000 per month
Labor Costs
$0 per month
In a scenario of 3 operators with 4 man hours, less labor each, per day at $25 per hr. – $100 per day = $3,600 per month
Increases System Capacity (Savings)
$3,600 per month
System ran @ 275 gpm at 200,000 gpd run time is now 12.2 hours/day vs. 16 hours. Savings of labor @25/hour x 4 hours = $100/day.
Electricity
$4,296 per month
100 hp = 74.6 kW at 16 hours at $0.16 per kw-hr = 190 per day = $5,700 per month
Additional Savings Factors
Shear Strength Cost $0 In facilities other than food processing they may need to use polymer as a floc additive prior to dewatering for a drier cake.
Recover Oil Resell for profit +$ Check to see if the oil is recoverable for reuse and/ or resell. Not only is the facility saving money in treatment, but recoverable oil can be sold as an additional profit.

Overall Costs

$67,504 per month

Estimated Net Savings $34,884 per month not counting profit from the resell of recovered oil.

Net Reduction of Cost 34%

 

[top]

Conclusion

In summary, it is possible to lower wastewater treatment expenditures, by understanding the surcharges and how they are assessed and by optimizing your facilities’ entire wastewater system, including chemistry, equipment and system operation.

Overall savings can show up as lower chemical costs and/or lower surcharge costs.

By simply taking the time to properly evaluate your wastestream, and optimizing any existing pretreatment system already in place, you can create substantial savings for your facility with this method and by using the Floccin™.

Thank you,

David Wensloff, PE, Founder & President Integrated Engineers Inc.

Click Here to Get Your Wastewater Optimization

Click Here to Download Your pdf Copy

Integrated Engineers Incorporated
40308 Greenwood Way
Oakhurst, CA 93644 USA
Country Code +1 (877) 965-1577 TOLL FREE
(559) 683-8284 phone
(559) 683-8913 fax

Email us:

sales@wecleanwater.com

Tortilla Producer Wastewater

Tortilla Producer Wastewater Case Study

TSS Drops from 1,883 ppm to 14 ppm

This facility manufactures corn tortillas using a solution of Lye to peel the skin from the corn and soften the corn.

The pH of the sample was received at 13.80 indicating a high basic solution.

To minimize operating costs, CO2 was used to drop the pH down to 8.0 instead of using the traditional acid.

The high pH water required about 5 minutes of sparging with the CO2 in order to drop the pH. Floccin™ 1105 was added at a dosage of 2 grams/1,000 ml and the water quality is shown below.

The wastewater required about 3 minutes of intense mixing to obtain this water clarity. The untreated suspended solids was measured at 1,833 ppm and the treated sample was at 14 ppm.

 

Tortilla Manufacturer Wastewater Case Study

 

Click to Download pdf of this Tortilla Producer Wastewater Study…

Download more industrial wastewater treatment case studies here…

Mexican Textile Dyeing Wastewater Case Study #2

Second Mexican Textile Dyeing Wastewater Case Study

Increase Capacity, Increase Compliance, Increase Profits *

This facility dyes material and this is a sample of their dye wastewater.

The pH was 7.27 and Floccin™ JP+ was used at a dosage of 0.5 grams/1,000 ml (4.17 lbs or 0.5 kg/ton of water).

The treated pH was 9.15.

The water was then filtered to simulate a settling or liquid/solids separation step.

The untreated suspended solids was measured at 285 ppm and the treated suspended solids were 25 ppm.

Mexican Textile Dyeing Wastewater Sample Test

Click to Download pdf of this Mexican Dyeing Wastewater Case Study #2…

Download more industrial wastewater treatment case studies here…

Mexican Textile Dyeing Wastewater #1

First Mexican Textile Dyeing Wastewater Case Study

Increase Capacity, Increase Compliance, Increase Profits *

This facility dyes material and this is a sample of their dye wastewater.

The pH was 9.73 and Floccin™ 909 was used at a dosage of 1 grams/1,000 ml (8.34 lbs or 1 kg/ton of water).

The treated pH was 9.3.

The water was then filtered to simulate a settling or liquid/solids separation step.

The untreated suspended solids was measured at 1,130 ppm and the treated suspended solids were 9 ppm.

Mexican Textile Dyeing Wastewater Sample Test

Click to Download pdf of this Mexican Dyeing Wastewater Case Study…

Download more industrial wastewater treatment case studies here…

Decorative Concrete Manufacturer

Floccin™ 909 excels in decorative concrete manufacturer wastewater jar test. The sample was high in solids including latex and coloring additives.

Click here to read the decorative concrete manufacturer wastewater case study and download a pdf…

Incoming search terms: